WelcomeTo My World

Friday, 26 December 2014

US police brutality protests hit home with Palestinian prisoners


In a letter written from an Israeli jail cell, Palestinian political prisoner Ameer Makhoul sends his salutations to African Americans protesting the police killing of unarmed Black men, women and youths.
“Even within Israeli jail, very much far away from you, we are mourning your beloved,” writes Makhoul in his 9 December letter.
Makhoul’s letter, which can be read in full at the bottom of this page, emphasizes the universality of the protests in the United States.
“Such racist official violence exasperates the conscience of all, and of course all 7,000 [Palestinian political prisoners] in Israel jail who seek freedom, liberty and justice for themselves as well as for their people of Palestine,” Makhoul states.
“Your cause is touching hearts everywhere,” he adds. “Your protest is on behalf of all humanity. Your voice is our voice … the voice of all free people.”
Makhoul underlines that like in Palestine, white settler-colonial racism is at the root of state violence in the US.
“The real sniper is the rooted racism which targets African-Americans because they are African-American,” Makhoul writes.
“Be sure that you are not alone, neither in the USA nor worldwide,” he adds. “Palestine backs your struggle.”
“I wish you a Merry Christmas and happy New Year, [in which] liberation from colonial racism and occupation become closer,” Makhoul concludes.

Ferguson and Palestine

Connections to repression in Palestine were expressed in the protests following the killing of unarmed Black teenager Michael Brown by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, last August.
Gaza in particular became a metaphor for state violence in Ferguson. Israel’s mass slaughter was still wiping out entire Palestinian families there when the protests erupted after Brown’s slaying.
“Will we as a people rise up like the people of Gaza? Will our community be bombed like last night with tear gas?” one Ferguson protester is quoted saying in an article titled “Michael Brown’s Hometown is Under Occupation,” published by The Daily Beast.
The “military-style crackdown by a squadron of local police departments dressed like combat soldiers … prompted residents to liken the conditions on the ground in Ferguson to the Israeli military occupation of Palestine,” The Electronic Intifada’s Rania Khalek wrote at the time.
Meanwhile, Palestinians and Palestine solidarity groups put out their own message of support and solidarity following the slaying of Michael Brown.
But the connection is more than symbolic, as Khalek has reported.
“Under the cover of counterterrorism training nearly every major US law enforcement agency has traveled to Israel for lessons in occupation enforcement, including the St. Louis County and St. Louis Metropolitan police departments,” writes Khalek.
“Since Michael Brown’s death, both agencies have on several occasions rampaged through the streets of St. Louis in military-style combat gear with the intention of crushing the Ferguson demonstrations, to no avail.”
As solidarity has grown between Palestinians and African Americans since the Ferguson uprising, so have efforts to repress this, as Khalek has analyzed.
“As the spirit of Ferguson’s resistance spreads to other American cities, so too has awareness about Israel’s influence on American policing,” Khalek writes in a recent in-depth report on this growing mutual solidarity.

Common torture

Ameer Makhoul, the author of the letter from Israeli prison, is no stranger to other common aspects of US and Israeli state violence.
Makhoul was director of Ittijah, a coalition representing Palestinian civil society groups in Israel, before he was arrested during a night raid on his home in Haifa, a city in present-day Israel.
For twelve days after his arrest, “Makhoul was held in incommunicado detention and was prevented from meeting a lawyer,” Shourideh C. Molavi recounts in her new book Stateless Citizenship: The Palestinian-Arab Citizens of Israel.
The discriminatory conditions “imposed on him as a security detainee,” depriving him of due process, led Makhoul’s defense team to threaten to boycott the court proceeding, a move unprecedented in Israel.
Makhoul was detained for three weeks before he was charged with espionage and “assistance to the enemy in a time of war,” which Makhoul vehemently denied when he finally appeared in an open court.
Israeli state prosecutors claimed they had “secret evidence” against Makhoul, the content of which was kept from his legal team. “Moreover, the prosecutors announced evidence in the form of a videotaped admission to the said charges,” Molavi writes.
But Makhoul’s legal team asserted that this admission was made under duress during extended interrogation in the first days of his detention.
The legal advocacy group Adalah described this distress as:
protracted sleep deprivation and continuous interrogation, while being shackled tightly to an under-sized chair that was bolted to the floor to prevent it from moving. His hands were cuffed to the back of the chair in a way that stretched his arms and shoulders sharply backward. His legs were folded backwards flanking the chair, with his knees turned toward the floor. When, after hours of being bound in this stress position while under intense interrogation, Makhoul complained of being in excruciating pain, the [Israeli] interrogators proceeded to cuff his legs to the chair. They also threatened that he would be permanently crippled from the interrogation.
Makhoul was sentenced by an Israeli court to nine years of imprisonment in May 2010. Because he is a Palestinian citizen of Israel, he is excluded from Israeli-Palestinian prisoner release agreements — “a product of the Oslo accords,” as Molavi points out.
The ill-treatment endured by Makhoul is characteristic of torture techniques long practiced by Israel which “are thought to inflict maximum suffering while minimizing the risk that they will leave tell-tale signs of torture on the victim’s body,” writes Rania Khalek.
Though Israel has banned the use of torture since 1999, a gaping “ticking time bomb” legal loophole allows Israeli interrogators to use torture to extract information from a detainee.
Hundreds of complaints of torture made by Palestinian prisoners since 2001 have led to zero criminal investigations, even in cases corroborated by the state, according to the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel.
Israel’s “ticking time bomb” loophole was cited by the CIA, the US foreign spy agency, to justify its torture regime, a US Senate inquiry recently revealed.
As Khalek notes, the Senate torture report disclosure “comes just months after revelations that the Obama administration relied on an Israeli high court ruling to justify targeted killings of American citizens without trial.”
CIA methods exposed in the Senate report “bear striking similarity to long-standing Israeli torture techniques documented by human rights organizations, among them sleep deprivation, exposure to extreme cold, confinement in very small spaces and painful ‘stress positions,’” Khalek adds.
--
Freedom Archives 



Wednesday, 24 December 2014

A Just Cause, On Behalf of IRP6, Escalates Case to Department of Justice and Questions if Rules of Professional Conduct Were Violated

A Just Cause Asks Department of Justice to Investigate if Federal Investigators Followed Proper Procedure in the IRP6 Case When Agents Contacted Philly Officials Regarding IRP Solutions

Denver, Colorado (PRWEB) December 24, 2014

A Just Cause (AJC) is appealing to the U.S. Department of Justice for an inquiry into the IRP6 case questioning if federal prosecutor’s and investigator’s actions resulted in a potential contract being halted between IRP Solutions and the City of Philadelphia. "Our ongoing investigation into facts and circumstances surrounding the federal investigation, prosecution and conviction of the IRP6 raises questions if conduct by law enforcement officials resulted in a wrongly conviction," ponders Sam Thurman, A Just Cause.
The IRP6 were convicted in October 2011 of mail and wire fraud charges in the United States District Court in Colorado (Case No. 09-CR-00266-CMA) and their appeals were affirmed by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on August 4, 2014 (Case Nos. 11-1487/1488/1489/1490/1491/1492). The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Kirsch and presided over by Judge Christine M. Arguello. The government claimed in the indictment that the IRP6 duped staffing companies into doing business with them by making "false representations" about "current or impending contracts with large government agencies, including the United States Department of Homeland Security." (Case No. 09-CR-00266-CMA).
“The government argued that IRP made ‘false representations,' yet AJC’s investigation of court records show that federal agents and prosecutors were aware that IRP Solutions was engaged in legitimate business activities in Philadelphia," says Thurman. “AJC’s review of court records show that all of the evidence was not presented at grand jury or during the trial court and had the federal prosecutor presented all evidence to the grand jury and to the court, it is very likely that there would not have been a case," argues Thurman. “The transcript from the trial shows that we were not allowed to present certain evidence like our activity with the City of Philadelphia," says David Banks, Chief Operating Officer, IRP Solutions (IRP6). (Case No. 09-CR-00266-CMA).
“Our latest review of court documents in the IRP case show that four months prior to taking the case before a second grand jury, federal prosecutors were aware that the Philadelphia Police Department and Philadelphia Inspector General's Office had agreed to terms with the IRP Solutions Corporation for the purchase and installation of their Case Investigative Life Cycle (CILC) software solution," says Thurman. “Federal prosecutors failed to present this to the second grand jury and they argued against the trial jury hearing this vital information during trail," says Thurman. (Case No. 09-CR-00266-CMA).
The AJC investigation of court documents show that in interview with the FBI, Gerry Cardenas, Director of Information Technology for the Philadelphia Police Department (PPD), acknowledged that IRP Solutions' Case Investigative Life Cycle software solution "look exactly like what Cardenas and the PPD was looking to purchase." Records show that Computer Chief/Security CIO Michael King was tasked with writing technical and system requirements so that the city could be prepared to install the software that IRP would provide. Court records confirm that IRP was close to installing software for PPD, but that all activity stopped when Cardenas was “made aware of the IRP investigation." (Discovery documents - Case No. 09-CR-00266-CMA).
"Why would AUSA Kirsch pursue an indictment where he claims the IRP6 lied about ‘current or impending contracts’ when he had irrefutable evidence that the City of Philadelphia had agreed to procure IRP Solutions software," questions Cliff Stewart, A Just Cause. “It is this type of activity that AJC believes warrants an investigation into the conduct of the federal agents and prosecutors involved in this case," adds Stewart.
As part of the argument for a federal inquiry, A Just Cause shows that court records show that David Banks, Chief Operating Officer of IRP Solutions, sent a letter of Philadelphia Deputy Mayor of Justice and Public Safety, Everett Gillison offering PPD IRP's search warrant module at no cost, include digitizing their search warrant documents. "Our sales efforts with the NYPD and Department of Homeland Security were scuttled from the criminal investigation and we decided that we would offer some modules free of charge and generate revenue from support and maintenance and additional customizations so we could pay our debts," says Banks. "After Deputy Mayor Gillison and I had a discussion over the phone, I booked a flight for Philadelphia to meet him in person," adds Banks. "After demonstrating our search warrant module to the Deputy Mayor, he immediately contacted Mr. Cardenas to view the software." (Discovery documents - Case No. 09-CR-00266-CMA)
"Court documents show an email exchange between Banks and Gillison that substantiates Banks' claims," argues Thurman. “The communication between Banks and Gillison show that IRP Solutions was moving forward with fulfilling their obligation the City of Philadelphia and that Philadelphia was poised to execute on the IRP proposal," says Thurman.
"According to Deputy Mayor Gillison, IBM and Motorola had a contract to modernize the department's enforcement systems but they were facing significant challenges, including search warrants," says Banks. "Gillison provided me with copy of their search warrant document and we incorporated it into CILC within two weeks and was ready for installation," adds Banks.
“In the FBI interview, Cardenas is reported as saying, ‘Deputy Mayor Gillison saw IRP's search warrant software as a critical need to solve a major problem for PPD where IBM had failed to deliver according to a contract they were awarded,'" says Stewart. “A grand jury and a trial jury should have been allowed to hear this evidence; that’s why we are now seeking an inquiry at the next level," adds Stewart.
According to a November 13, 2012 article by Juliana Reyes in the Philadelphia-based publication Technical.ly Philly regarding the state of police information technology, PPD was reeling from a corruption scandal and was being closely monitored by a federal judge to ensure they digitized their systems to increase transparency in compliance with a legal settlement (http://technical.ly/philly/2012/11/13/philadelphia-police-typewriters-technology/). Reyes reported that PPD was under tremendous pressure to automate their investigative reports, including search warrants. IBM had won a $4.7 million dollar, 30-month contract to computerize the department's records but the project encountered significant challenges, including a project that lagged on for 10 years with a $2.4 million dollar budget overrun and a search warrant solution that wasn't delivered. "When I contacted Deputy Mayor Gillison I was unaware of their critical need for a search warrant solution and judicial oversight but was very excited about the opportunity," says Banks. "I believe that IRP Solutions was in an excellent position with the City of Philadelphia, but I have serious questions about what the FBI and the AUSA Kirsch did when they contacted city officials”, ponders Banks. “A great sales opportunity went away and we feel that the actions of the federal agents and prosecutor hurt our reputation," adds Banks. “Court records show that there is reason to question if federal agents and prosecutors violated rules, and we are thankful that A Just Cause is pushing this case to the next level," exclaims Banks.
Court documents show that IRP Solutions made a similar offer for the CILC case management solution to the Philadelphia Inspector General's Office that was accepted by IG Amy Kurland. Court records confirm that Kurland made arrangements for Banks and Walker to meet with Mayor Nutter where he would 'thank' IRP Solutions for what it was doing for the City of Philadelphia. Court records further confirm that Lorelei Larson, Chief Investigator for IG's office, states to Banks in an email, "All the OIG staff is very excited about this venture” (Discovery documents - Case No. 09-CR-00266-CMA). Records show that business halted after IRP Solutions was contacted by the office of the IG. "Ms. Kurland's secretary contacted me and informed me that Ms. Kurland had been told by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kirsch over the phone that 'an indictment was coming' and she regrettably had to cancel our software project," says Banks. "Statements made to like 'an indictment is coming' are inappropriate especially when there was no grand jury impaneled at the time," says Thurman. "That type of activity is one of the issues AJC wants an independent panel to review," adds Thurman.
According to the American Bar Associations Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor, “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall: "Refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause," says Thurman. "Court records show that AUSA Kirsch empanelled a second grand jury after an initial grand jury did not return an indictment against the IRP6. Is it ethically and morally wrong for a prosecutor to pursue a second indictment and prosecution when, like in the case of IRP with Philly, there is evidence that the business was legitimate," adds Thurman. "It gives credibility not only to the excellence of the CILC software but to the argument that other IRP sales efforts with the Department of Homeland Security, NYPD and other agencies were also destroyed by the actions of the FBI and U.S. Attorneys Office," concludes Thurman. “This makes A Just Cause hopeful that folks at the federal level will take a hard look at the IRP6 case and see that there are grounds for an independent inquiry,” says Thurman.
A Just Cause (AJC) continues its advocacy and review of court records for the six Colorado information technology executives known as the "IRP6" (David A. Banks, Kendrick Barnes, David A. Zirpolo, Gary L. Walker, Clinton A. Stewart and Demetrius K. Harper).
For additional information on IRP Solutions and the City of Philadelphia, go to http://www.freetheirp6.org
For blog posts by David Banks (IRP6) go to http://www.freetheirp6.org/#!stand-up-blog/ci23/Page/3/

Merry Christmas Norberto Gonzalez Claudio!



NO ONE SHOULD BE IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR CHRISTMAS!


NORBERTO GONZALEZ CLAUDIO NEEDS YOUR SOLIDARITY!
GIVE NORBERTO THE GIFT OF SOLIDARITY AND MAKE YOUR PHONE CALL TODAY!

Puerto Rican Political Prisoner Norberto Gonzalez Claudio continues to be in solitary confinement and can't contact family and lawyers in the federal prison in Coleman, Fl.

On Monday November 10th, Norberto's attorney, Jan Susler, got a phone call from him; he said he didn't know how long he'd be in solitary confinement.  Usually, when an inmate first enters solitary he or she is told how long they will be held.

Prison staff are supposed to send Jan documents explaining why he's been placed in solitary, but to date she has not received this information. Jan says the accusation against Norberto is a simple matter (allegedly, he raised his voice to a prison guard) and therefore it's not justifiable "punishment" to transfer him to a higher security prison and to place him in solitary confinement, which he's been in for the past 23 days (since October 21st).

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign denounces this horrible mistreatment of Norberto Gonzalez Claudio!  Norberto has been exposed to new prison inmates and jailers unknown to him; he has no contact with family and barely any contact with his lawyer; and he has been SEGREGATED without any human contact, which is a form of psychological torture. We must be vigilant because this inexplicable punishment could be used against Norberto to delay his release on January 15, 2015! 
The day he was transferred from FCI Coleman Low his handcuffs were so tight it made his wrists bleed.  According to a letter he sent to his wife, his wrists have hurt him for weeks.  His cell is always freezing cold and the one window in his cell has been    covered; he cannot  look outside or enjoy some relief from the constant cold.


In response to this crisis, ProLibertad is asking all our allies to call FCI Coleman Medium and demand that Norberto be returned to FCI Coleman Low and to general population.  

Norberto needs us to call in the THOUSANDS!  Make a call once a day and ask your friends and family to do likewise.  Call FCI Coleman Medium at 352-689-5000!

Sample Message:

Puerto Rican Political Prisoner, Norberto Gonzalez Claudio (prison number 09864-000), has been held in solitary confinement since October 21st for no justifiable reason.  This prolonged period of confinement is a violation of his human rights and is considered a form of torture!  We demand that he be returned to the general population of FCI Coleman Low.



The Pennsylvania Parole Board War Against The Move 9 - Michael Africa



Sunday, December 21, 2014

http://move9parole.blogspot.com/

The Pa Parole Board War Against The Move 9

On The Move!!!

On November 12th I had a parole hearing, My 7th since becoming eligible in 2008. The latest  hearing was presided over by Parole Board Members Gray and Shultz. Gray was in Harrisburg ,
Conducting her interview via T.V. Monitor, and kicked off the hearing by asking me what happened The day of the offense.

I told them what happened  on 8/8/78  occurred  because in march 1976  police came out to Headquarters attacking Move People. They attacked Janine , knocking her infant son from her her arms and stomped on the baby crushing his skull. Move people went to the authorities demanding attention to that heinous crime and received no response. The D.A. (Ed Rendell )  was contacted  and he flatly refused to investigate. The police , as usual , lied. Denying that the incident ever occurred when contacted by the local press ..

Finally, Move invited  Philadelphia city council members to our house to view the lifeless form of Life Africa, Janine and Phil's murdered son. The cities response to this news report, As well as the ensuing call for an investigation by those city council members , was not to respond at all. Absolute silence from officials who take every opportunity to castigate any incident even remotely connected to The Move Organization and nothing more from the mainstream press who has always acted in concert with racist city officials .

So we held a demonstration at our Headquarters. To expose what had happened to the public what city officials were trying their best to cover up. However, rather than heed their own city officials call for an independent outside review into the murder., Philadelphia city officials forced a standoff , eventually sending 500-600  more  of those same crazy cops to further attack us. Firing in huge amounts of water , tear gas, smoke and bullets in the basement . Where they knew we all were.

Gray's only comment was that it was clear to her that I was sticking to my version and said she had nothing further she wanted to ask. Shultz then asked her only question of the hearing . She asked who was responsible for the incident. I said city officials and the cops. We didn't assault their women and children . They came to our house doing these things. We were all in the basement of the house  6 feet  below street level nearly drowning from all of the water being pumped in by fireman and blinded by tear gas and smoke shot in by the cops. The cop that was killed was facing our Headquarters  when struck by a bullet that hit from behind  traveling on a downward trajectory.

Which was impossible for any of us to have done even if you believe we had guns , which we did not. Our only goal in doing what we did  was to bring attention to the injustice being meted out to The Move Organization by philly cops at the direction  of city officials . We simply asked that our family  stop being assaulted and murdered by those city cops and because they refused  our requests. We had a demonstration to  publicize our plight directly to the people. Just as you see being done in the cases of ferguson Missouri , with Oscar Grant  in Oakland , and many other cities . Until these incidents were exposed to the people by the people , forcing media attention and calls for Justice , only then was there a semblance of an official investigation . Well, that is all  that Move did 37 years ago.

Shultz said she had nothing further to ask and the hearing was over .Needless to say, their not even bothering to ask any routine questions about a home plan, job plan , or anything else  related to life outside of prison , Is always a clear indication that they never intend to consider release . The entire hearing didn't last more than a couple of minutes . So now I await the official response of what they've made crystal clear in the past six parole hearings. They intend to finish the job that philly officials , Their Storm Trooper Cops, Their Racist Judges and Bias press started decades earlier.

Michael ( Davis ) Africa Sr

-- Freedom Archives 




Monday, 22 December 2014

Fairytale Of New York Bagpipes





Fairytale Of New York Bagpipes played by the Lone Star Pipers

"Fairytale of New York" is a Christmas song by the Celtic punk group The Pogues, released in 1987 and featuring singer Kirsty MacColl. The song is an Irish folk style ballad, written by Jem Finer and Shane MacGowan, and featured on The Pogues' album If I Should Fall from Grace with God. The song features string arrangements by Fiachra Trench. It has been cited as the best Christmas song of all time in various television, radio and magazine related polls in the UK and Ireland.

The song follows an Irish immigrant's Christmas Eve reverie about holidays past while sleeping off a binge in a New York City drunk tank. When an inebriated old man also in the cell sings a passage from the Irish ballad "The Rare Old Mountain Dew", the narrator (MacGowan) begins to dream about the song's female character. The remainder of the song (which may be an internal monologue) takes the form of a call and response between the couple, their youthful hopes crushed by alcoholism and drug addiction, as they reminisce and bicker on Christmas Eve.

MacColl's melodious singing contrasts with the harshness of MacGowan's voice, and the lyrics are sometimes bittersweet—sometimes purely bitter: "Happy Christmas your arse/I pray God it's our last". The lyrics "Sinatra was swinging" and "cars as big as bars" seem to place the song in the late 1940s. The title, taken from author J. P. Donleavy's novel A Fairy Tale of New York, was chosen after the song had been written and recorded.

Twice MacGowan and MacColl sing, "The boys of the NYPD choir still singing "Galway Bay". The New York Police Department (NYPD) does not have a choir, but it does have a Pipes and Drums unit that is featured in the video for the song. The NYPD Pipes and Drums did not know "Galway Bay" and so sang and played the Mickey Mouse Club theme tune for the music video instead, and the editor put it in slow motion to fit the beat. The video featured Matt Dillon as the NYPD patrol man who arrests the intoxicated MacGowan.