Statement by Mark A. Clements, former Juvenile Lifer sentence to die in prison
Thursday was a time for celebration and high fives as the Illinois Supreme Court ruled retroactivity status through the case of People Vs. Addolfo Davis. In 2012 the U.S. Supreme court ruled that juvenile offenders sentence to mandatory terms of natural life had been sentence in violation of their 8th amendment to be free from"Cruel and Unusual Punishment" . Almost immediately once Davis case was decided before the Illinois Supreme court in January-2014 prosecutors and family&friends of crime victims were consulting with Illinois State Legislator Dennis M. Reboletti (R-Elmhurst) to attempt to overturn the Davis ruling. Prosecutors and crime victims encouraged Reboletti to file legislation that would address the issue of kids sentence to die behind the walls of a Illinois State prison.
Illinois HB 5927 calls for all JUVENILES that were sentence to natural life absent mitigation hearings in violation of MILLER to be sentenced between 60 to 100 years, including the possibility that some could indeed be sentence to a term of natural life without parole. This sentence remains cruel and unusual punishment as it affords a judge no flexibility to sentence the youth offender to a lesser penalty. It also calls for natural life sentences to be applied if a judge deem it to be appropriate.
The unfairness of kids bonded over to the adult system, told to remain silent as their attorneys prepare and arguer their case before a judge. Some so medicated from psychological medication they slept during segments of their trial. Often many did not even understand the process, many uneducated while their attorneys made key costly mistakes during the trial. Over 90 percent of "JLWOP" were legally represented by public defenders that lacked resources to conduct proper discovery, examination of the evidence, DNA testing, investigations, and proper knowledge of their clients case. For example, I was charged, tried and convicted based off of a confession that identified another person as the culprit to the crime and despite the confession including three other individuals State prosecutors made a decision that I should be charged while the three others were never charged. If the confession was reliable enough to have me charged with the crime based off of the confession alone!, it surely should have been RELIABLE to charge and indict others. However it was the choice of State prosecutors that I be charged based off of the confession. Had they indicted others, it would have destroyed the prosecutors case to obtain a conviction based off of the CONFESSION in which I was tortured to repeat to a cook county prosecutor, because it literally made no common sense. The confession reads that their were four people that went to an apartment on the south side of Chicago. That I was told to collect some bottles. The confession states that I collected three bottles filled them up with gasoline and tortured a resident by stabbing him and pouring gas on his pants legs. It further states, that a KM requested that we go down stairs and get the bottles and that we all had a bottle a piece. How can 4 people and 3 bottles, have a bottle a piece? its unrealistic as was 7100 S. Wells in Chicago. Their is no 7100 S. Wells in Chicago. A Cook County medical examiner testified that he performed the autopsies on the four deceased victims. He found no evidence of a stabbing, nor of a beating. Bottles recovered by Fire and Police officials were allegedly tested for finger prints in which my attorneys were told had a partial print. Because the confession stated that "we" stabbed the victim a knife I kept on me to cut straps from news papers that I delivered was confiscated from me and used into evidence against me. It was the theory of prosecutors that I used this knife and that it obtain blood from the victim Robert Watson. Because I was poor and could not afford an attorney testing on these items could never have been done until 2008. Their were several finger prints found on the bottles that linked to investigative police officers assigned to the investigation and the knife has no blood on it whatsoever. Perhaps if their was a parole board in the State of Illinois for youth offenders sentence to "JLWOP" I would not have had to sit behind the walls of a prison for 28 years of my life.
We must be realistic that sentencing a youth offender between 60 to 100 years inside a prison remain to be a death sentence for these kids. Some like Joseph Rodriguez have achieved all of its rehabilitative opportunities. He has been incarcerated since age 15 for a south side gang related double murder. Joseph has remained incarcerated since 1981 despite his denouncement of his street gang, showing remorse for his crimes, achieving an education, working in the library, serving as a guide for other young offenders to walk up right as he has used his situation to show some the errors of their lives. Joseph has been placed in a prison that once offered many rehabilitative opportunities, however today in wake of a hostage stand off and rape at the prison in May, 2006, its been the opinion of prisons to strip away most privileges depriving all inmates based off of the conduct of one. Joseph is warehoused inside his prison cell much as 19 hours a day. All he has to look forwarded to receiving is a shower, telephone call, mail, visit and walks around the prison yard. They walk in circles around the prison yard praying to some day to granted a second opportunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment