FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
– September 1, 2015
Prisoner
Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition
CA
Prisoners Win Historic Gains with Settlement against
Solitary Confinement
Agreement
reached in Ashker
v. Brown, end to indeterminate long-term solitary
confinement in CA among the gains for prisoners
Oakland
– Today, California prisoners locked in isolation achieved a
groundbreaking legal victory in their ongoing struggle against
the use of solitary confinement. A settlement was reached in
the federal class action suit Ashker v. Brown,
originally filed in 2012, effectively ending indefinite
long-term solitary confinement, and greatly limiting the
prison administration’s ability to use the practice, widely
seen as a form of torture. The lawsuit was brought on behalf
of prisoners held in Pelican Bay State Prison’s infamous
Security Housing Units (SHU) for more than 10 years, where
they spend 23 hours a day or more in their cells with little
to no access to family visits, outdoor time, or any kind of
programming.
“From
the historic prisoner-led hunger strikes of 2011 and 2013, to
the work of families, loved ones, and advocate, this
settlement is a direct result of our grassroots organizing,
both inside and outside prison walls,” said Dolores Canales of
California Families Against Solitary Confinement (CFASC), and
mother of a prisoner in Pelican Bay. “This legal victory is
huge, but is not the end of our fight – it will only make the
struggle against solitary and imprisonment everywhere
stronger.” The 2011 and 2013 hunger strikes gained widespread
international attention that for the first time in recent
years put solitary confinement under mainstream scrutiny.
Currently,
many prisoners are in solitary because of their “status” –
having been associated with political ideologies or gang
affiliation. However, this settlement does away with the
status-based system, leaving solitary as an option only in
cases of serious behavioral rule violations. Furthermore, the
settlement limits the amount of time a prisoner may be held in
solitary, and sets a two year Step-Down Program for the
release of current solitary prisoners into the general
population.
It is
estimated that between 1,500 and 2,000 prisoners will be
released from SHU within one year of this settlement. A higher
security general population unit will be created for a small
number of cases where people have been in SHU for more than 10
years and have a recent serious rule violation.
“Despite
the repeated attempts by the prison regime to break the
prisoners’ strength, they have remained unified in this
fight,” said Marie Levin of CFASC and sister of a prisoner
representative named in the lawsuit. “The Agreement to End
Hostilities and the unity of the prisoners are crucial to this
victory, and will continue to play a significant role in their
ongoing struggle.” The Agreement to End Hostilities is an
historic document put out by prisoner representatives in
Pelican Bay in 2012 calling on all prisoners to build unity
and cease hostilities between racial groups.
Prisoner
representatives and their legal counsel will regularly meet
with California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
officials as well as with Federal Magistrate Judge Nandor
Vadas, who is tasked with overseeing the reforms, to insure
that the settlement terms are being implemented.
"Without the hunger strikes and without the
Agreement to End Hostilities to bring California's prisoners
together and commit to risking their lives--- by being
willing to die for their cause by starving for 60 days, we
would not have this settlement today," said Anne Weills of
Siegel and Yee, co-counsel in the case. "It will improve the
living conditions for thousands of men and women and no
longer have them languishing for decades in the hole at PB.
“This
victory was achieved by the efforts of people in prison, their
families and loved ones, lawyers, and outside supporters,”
said the prisoners represented in the settlement in a joint
statement. “We celebrate this victory while at the same time,
we recognize that achieving our goal of fundamentally
transforming the criminal justice system and stopping the
practice of warehousing people in prison will be a protracted
struggle.”
Legal
co-counsel in the case includes California Prison Focus,
Siegel & Yee, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children,
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Chistensen O’Connor Johnson
Kindness PLLC, and the Law Offices of Charles Carbone. The
lead counsel is the Center for Constitutional Rights. The
judge in the case is Judge Claudia Wilken in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California.
A
rally and press conference are set for 12pm in front of the
Elihu M Harris State Building in Oakland, which will be
livestreamed at http://livestre.am/5bsWO.
The settlement can be read on CCR’s website,
along with a summary. CCR has also put up
downloadable clips of the plaintiffs’ depositions here.
--
Freedom Archives
Freedom Archives
Questions and comments may be sent to claude@freedomarchives.org
Free All Political Prisoners!
www.jerichony.org
No comments:
Post a Comment